Journal cover Journal topic
Solid Earth An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.165 IF 4.165
  • IF 5-year value: 4.075 IF 5-year
    4.075
  • CiteScore value: 4.28 CiteScore
    4.28
  • SNIP value: 1.501 SNIP 1.501
  • SJR value: 1.060 SJR 1.060
  • IPP value: 4.21 IPP 4.21
  • h5-index value: 29 h5-index 29
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 27 Scimago H
    index 27
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2019-9
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2019-9
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 27 Feb 2019

Research article | 27 Feb 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Solid Earth (SE).

Constraining the geotherm beneath the British Isles from Bayesian inversion of Curie depth: Integrated modelling of magnetic, geothermal and seismic data

Ben Mather and Javier Fullea Ben Mather and Javier Fullea
  • Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, School of Cosmic Physics, 5 Merrion Square, Dublin 2, Ireland

Abstract. Curie depth offers a valuable constraint on the thermal structure of the lithosphere, based on its interpretation as the depth to 580 °C, but current methods underestimate the range of uncertainty. We formulate the estimation of Curie depth within a Bayesian framework to quantify its uncertainty across the British Isles. Uncertainty increases exponentially with Curie depth but this can be moderated by increasing the size of the spatial window taken from the magnetic anomaly. The choice of window size needed to resolve the magnetic thickness is often ambiguous, but based on our chosen spectral method, we determine that significant gains in precision can be obtained with windows sizes 15–30 times larger than the deepest magnetic source. Our Curie depth map of the British Isles includes a combination of window sizes: smaller windows are used where the magnetic base is shallow to resolve small-scale features, and larger window sizes are used where the magnetic base is deep in order to improve precision. On average, the Curie depth increases from Laurentian crust (22.2 ± 5.3 km) to Avalonian crust (31.2 ± 9.2 km). The temperature distribution in the crust, and associated uncertainty, was simulated from the ensemble of Curie depth realisations assigned to a lower thermal boundary condition of a crustal model (sedimentary thickness, Moho depth, heat production, thermal conductivity), constructed from various geophysical and geochemical data sets. The uncertainty of the simulated heat flow field substantially increases from ± 10 mW m−2 for shallow Curie depths ~ 15 km to ± 80 mW m−2 for Curie depths > 40 km. Surface heat flow observations are concordant with the simulated heat flow field except in regions that contain igneous bodies. Heat flow data within large batholiths in the British Isles exceed the simulated heat flow by ∼ 25 mW m−2 as a result of their high rates of heat production (4–6 μW m−3). Conversely, heat refraction around thermally resistive mafic volcanics and thick sedimentary layers induce a negative heat flow misfit of a similar magnitude. A northward thinning of the lithosphere is supported by shallower Curie depths on the northern side of the Iapetus Suture, which separates Laurentian and Avalonian terranes. Cenozoic volcanism in Northern Britain and Ireland has previously been attributed to a lateral branch of the proto-Icelandic mantle plume. Our results show that high surface heat flow (> 90 mW m−2) and shallow Curie depth (∼ 15 km) occur within the same region, which supports the hypothesis that lithospheric thinning occurred due to the influence of a mantle plume. That the uncertainty is only ± 3–8 km in this region, demonstrates that Curie depths are more reliable in hotter regions of the crust where the magnetic base is shallow.

Ben Mather and Javier Fullea
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 08 Apr 2019)
Status: open (until 08 Apr 2019)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
  • RC1: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Mar 2019 Printer-friendly Version
Ben Mather and Javier Fullea
Ben Mather and Javier Fullea
Viewed  
Total article views: 169 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
133 35 1 169 8 3 0
  • HTML: 133
  • PDF: 35
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 169
  • Supplement: 8
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 70 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 69 with geography defined and 1 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
Latest update: 25 Mar 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation