Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.165 IF 4.165
  • IF 5-year value: 4.075 IF 5-year 4.075
  • CiteScore value: 4.28 CiteScore 4.28
  • SNIP value: 1.501 SNIP 1.501
  • SJR value: 1.060 SJR 1.060
  • IPP value: 4.21 IPP 4.21
  • h5-index value: 29 h5-index 29
  • Scimago H index value: 27 Scimago H index 27
Discussion papers | Copyright
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2018-63
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 16 Jul 2018

Research article | 16 Jul 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Solid Earth (SE).

Oblique rifting: the rule, not the exception

Sascha Brune1,2, Simon E. Willliams3, and R. Dietmar Müller3,4 Sascha Brune et al.
  • 1GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
  • 2Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
  • 3EarthByte Group, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
  • 4Sydney Informatics Hub, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract. Movements of tectonic plates often induce oblique deformation at divergent plate boundaries. This is in striking contrast with traditional conceptual models of rifting and rifted margin formation, which often assume 2D deformation where the rift velocity is oriented perpendicular to the plate boundary. Here we quantify the validity of this assumption by analysing the kinematics of major continent-scale rift systems in a global plate tectonic reconstruction from the onset of Pangea breakup until present-day. We evaluate rift obliquity by joint examination of relative extension velocity and local rift trend using the script-based plate reconstruction software pyGPlates. Our results show that the global mean rift obliquity amounts to 34° with a standard deviation of 24°, using the convention that the angle of obliquity is spanned by extension direction and rift trend normal. We find that more than ~70% of all rift segments exceeded an obliquity of 20° demonstrating that oblique rifting should be considered the rule, not the exception. In many cases, rift obliquity and extension velocity increase during rift evolution (e.g. Australia-Antarctica, Gulf of California, South Atlantic, India-Antarctica), which suggests an underlying geodynamic correlation via obliquity-dependent rift strength. Oblique rifting produces 3D stress and strain fields that cannot be accounted for in simplified 2D plane strain analysis. We therefore highlight the importance of 3D approaches in modelling, surveying, and interpretation of most rift segments on Earth where oblique rifting is the dominant mode of deformation.

Download & links
Sascha Brune et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: open (until 08 Sep 2018)
Status: open (until 08 Sep 2018)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Sascha Brune et al.
Sascha Brune et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 500 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
429 68 3 500 3 3
  • HTML: 429
  • PDF: 68
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 500
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jul 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jul 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 500 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 494 with geography defined and 6 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited
Saved
No saved metrics found.
Discussed
Latest update: 15 Aug 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share