Journal cover Journal topic
Solid Earth An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.495 IF 3.495
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 3.386 IF 5-year
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 3.70 CiteScore
  • SNIP value: 0.783 SNIP 0.783
  • SJR value: 1.039 SJR 1.039
  • IPP value: 1.987 IPP 1.987
  • h5-index value: 20 h5-index 20
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
28 May 2018
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Solid Earth (SE).
The impact of earthquake cycle variability on neotectonic and paleoseismic slip rate estimates
Richard Styron 1Earth Analysis, 21855 Bear Creek Road, Los Gatos, CA 95033 USA
2Global Earthquake Model Foundation, Via Ferrata 1, Pavia 27100 Italy
3Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Ritchie Hall, Earth Energy & Environment Center, 1414 Naismith Drive, Room 254, Lawrence, KS 66054 USA
Abstract. Because of the natural variability (aleatoric uncertainty) in earthquake recurrence intervals and coseismic displacements on a fault, cumulative slip on a fault does not increase linearly or perfectly step-wise with time; instead, some amount of variability in shorter-term slip rates results. Though this variability could greatly affect the accuracy of neotectonic (i.e., late Quaternary) and paleoseismic slip rate estimates, these effects have not been quantified. In this study, idealized faults with four different, representative earthquake recurrence distributions are created with equal mean recurrence intervals (1,000 years) and coseismic slip distributions, and the variability in slip rate measurements over 500 to 100,000 year measurement windows is calculated for all faults through Monte Carlo simulations. The recurrence distributions used are quasi-periodic, unclustered and clustered lognormal distributions, and an unclustered exponential distribution. The results demonstrate that the most important parameter is the coefficient of variation (COV = standard deviation/mean) of the recurrence distributions rather than the shape of the distribution itself. Slip rate variability over short time scales (< 10,000 years or 10 mean earthquake cycles) is quite high, but decreases with time and is close to stable after ~ 40,000 years (40 mean earthquake cycles). This variability is higher for recurrence distributions with a higher COV. The natural variability in the slip rate estimates compared to the true value is then used to estimate the epistemic uncertainty in a single slip rate measurement (as one would make in a geological study) in the absence of any measurement uncertainty. This epistemic uncertainty is very high (a factor of 2 or more) for measurement windows of a few mean earthquake cycles (as in a paleoseismic slip rate estimate), but decreases rapidly to a factor of 1–2 with > 5 mean earthquake cycles (as in a neotectonic slip rate study). These uncertainties are independent of, and should be propagated with uncertainties in fault displacement and geochronologic measurements used to estimate slip rates. They may then aid in the comparison of slip rates from different methods or the evaluation of potential slip rate changes over time.
Citation: Styron, R.: The impact of earthquake cycle variability on neotectonic and paleoseismic slip rate estimates, Solid Earth Discuss.,, in review, 2018.
Richard Styron
Richard Styron

Model code and software

eq-slip-rate-variability-paper R. Styron
Richard Styron


Total article views: 363 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
308 50 5 363 1 1

Views and downloads (calculated since 28 May 2018)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 May 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 363 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 359 with geography defined and 4 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1



Latest update: 20 Jun 2018
Publications Copernicus
Short summary
Successive earthquakes on a single fault are not perfectly periodic in time. There is some natural random variability. This leads to variations in estimated fault slip rates over short timescales though the longer-term mean slip rate stays constant, which may cause problems when comparing slip rates at different timescales. This paper is the first to quantify these effects, demonstrating substantial variation in slip rates over a few to tens of earthquakes, but much less at longer timescales.
Successive earthquakes on a single fault are not perfectly periodic in time. There is some...