Journal cover Journal topic
Solid Earth An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.495 IF 3.495
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 3.386 IF 5-year
    3.386
  • CiteScore<br/> value: 3.70 CiteScore
    3.70
  • SNIP value: 0.783 SNIP 0.783
  • SJR value: 1.039 SJR 1.039
  • IPP value: 1.987 IPP 1.987
  • h5-index value: 20 h5-index 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2018-35
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
02 May 2018
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Solid Earth (SE).
Bimodal or quadrimodal? Statistical tests for the shape of fault patterns
David Healy1 and Peter Jupp2 1School of Geosciences, King’s College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE Scotland
2School of Mathematics & Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9SS Scotland
Abstract. Natural fault patterns, formed in response to a single tectonic event, often display significant variation in their orientation distribution. The cause of this variation is the subject of some debate: it could be noise on underlying conjugate (or bimodal) fault patterns or it could be intrinsic signal from an underlying polymodal (e.g. quadrimodal) pattern. In this contribution, we present new statistical tests to assess the probability of a fault pattern having two (bimodal, or conjugate) or four (quadrimodal) underlying modes. We use the eigenvalues of the 2nd and 4th rank orientation tensors, derived from the direction cosines of the poles to the fault planes, as the basis for our tests. Using a combination of the existing fabric eigenvalue (or modified Flinn) plot and our new tests, we can discriminate reliably between bimodal (conjugate) and quadrimodal fault patterns. We validate our tests using synthetic fault orientation datasets constructed from multimodal Watson distributions, and then assess six natural fault datasets from outcrops and earthquake focal plane solutions. We show that five out of six of these natural datasets are probably quadrimodal. The tests have been implemented in the R language and a link is given to the authors’ source code.
Citation: Healy, D. and Jupp, P.: Bimodal or quadrimodal? Statistical tests for the shape of fault patterns, Solid Earth Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2018-35, in review, 2018.
David Healy and Peter Jupp
David Healy and Peter Jupp
David Healy and Peter Jupp

Viewed

Total article views: 270 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
242 26 2 270 0 0

Views and downloads (calculated since 02 May 2018)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 May 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 270 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 268 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 24 May 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Fault patterns, formed in response to a single tectonic event, often display significant variation in their orientations. This variation could be noise on underlying conjugate (or bimodal) fault patterns or it could be intrinsic signal from an underlying polymodal (e.g. quadrimodal) pattern. We present new statistical tests and open source R code to calculate the probability of a fault pattern having two (bimodal, or conjugate) or four (quadrimodal) clusters based on their orientations.
Fault patterns, formed in response to a single tectonic event, often display significant...
Share