Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.165 IF 4.165
  • IF 5-year value: 4.075 IF 5-year 4.075
  • CiteScore value: 4.28 CiteScore 4.28
  • SNIP value: 1.501 SNIP 1.501
  • SJR value: 1.060 SJR 1.060
  • IPP value: 4.21 IPP 4.21
  • h5-index value: 29 h5-index 29
  • Scimago H index value: 27 Scimago H index 27
Discussion papers | Copyright
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2017-59
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Short communication 28 Jul 2017

Short communication | 28 Jul 2017

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Solid Earth (SE). The revised manuscript was not accepted.

Should oasification be ignored when examining desertification in Northwest China?

Dongwei Gui1,2, Jie Xue1,2,3,4, Yi Liu1,2,3,4, Jiaqiang Lei1,2, and Fanjiang Zeng1,2 Dongwei Gui et al.
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China
  • 2Cele National Station of Observation and Research for Desert-Grassland Ecosystems, Cele 848300, Xinjiang, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Biogeography and Bioresource in Arid Zone, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, Xinjiang, China
  • 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract. There has been substantial expansion of oases in the Northwest of China in recent decades; however, research has largely focused on desertification rather than oasification and its associated mechanisms. Based on the description of desertification in arid regions and other regions, and analysis of oasification in arid or hyper-arid areas, we firstly elucidate the theoretical relationship between oasification and desertification. We then examine the current understanding in oasification research, and propose that this will enhance our understanding of desertification through the integration of studies of oasification. Finally, we suggest three potential topics for future oasification research. We also propose a simple conceptual model for the identification of an appropriate oasis size under different land uses, including the crucial assessment of associated uncertainties. Based on the analysis of oasification research from an epistemological and methodological perspective, we suggest that oasification should have equal research status to desertification in arid regions.

Download & links
Dongwei Gui et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Dongwei Gui et al.
Dongwei Gui et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 343 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
275 55 13 343 1 10
  • HTML: 275
  • PDF: 55
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 343
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jul 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jul 2017)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 344 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 342 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited
Saved
No saved metrics found.
Discussed
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 15 Aug 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This paper clarifies the dialectical relationship between oasification and desertification in arid regions, and it also elucidates the significance of oasification research in Northwest China. Furthermore, the study points out the key point in the oasification research.
This paper clarifies the dialectical relationship between oasification and desertification in...
Citation
Share