Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.165 IF 4.165
  • IF 5-year value: 4.075 IF 5-year 4.075
  • CiteScore value: 4.28 CiteScore 4.28
  • SNIP value: 1.501 SNIP 1.501
  • SJR value: 1.060 SJR 1.060
  • IPP value: 4.21 IPP 4.21
  • h5-index value: 29 h5-index 29
  • Scimago H index value: 27 Scimago H index 27
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/sed-7-2011-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/sed-7-2011-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 30 Jul 2015

Research article | 30 Jul 2015

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Solid Earth (SE). The revised manuscript was not accepted.

Effects of soil depth on the dynamics of selected soil properties among the highlands resources of Northeast Wollega, Ethiopia: are these sign of degradation?

A. Adugna1,2 and A. Abegaz1 A. Adugna and A. Abegaz
  • 1Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • 2Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Wolaita Sodo University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Abstract. This study was conducted with an aim to analyze the spatial variability of soil properties with depth under four prominent land use patterns viz., forestland, grazing land, cultivated land and bush land of Northeast Wollega. Soil samples were collected from the land uses at two depths (0–15 and 15–30 cm) in replicates and totally 40 composite soil samples were collected. Statistical analysis revealed significant variation in soil properties with along the selected land uses. Topsoil layer had significantly greater OM, TN, AP, sand, silt, Mg2+, K+ and Mg2+ concentrations than the subsoil layers. However, clay under all land uses and CEC under bush land and grazing land revealed reverse trends. Organic matter and CEC have stronger correlations with most of soil properties in the topsoil than in the subsoil while clay has no significant correlation with selected soil properties except with sand fraction in the sampled depths. Hence, the correlation among the selected soil properties also varies with soil depth. In general, the spatial variability of soil properties indicates that they were strongly affected by external factors (agricultural treatments and soil management practices) and internal factors (soil type and depth).

A. Adugna and A. Abegaz
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
A. Adugna and A. Abegaz
A. Adugna and A. Abegaz
Viewed  
Total article views: 622 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
286 314 22 622 4 12
  • HTML: 286
  • PDF: 314
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 622
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Jul 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Jul 2015)
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 21 Nov 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Most of selected soil properties showed highest variation with depth under forestland and lowest under cropland. There were no consistent spatial trends in CEC. The correlation matrix suggests OM, CEC and Ca are fundamental soil properties in both sampled depths. The Correlations among soil properties are determined by soil-forming processes than parent materials. However, it is difficult to explain on which sampled depths that correlation between soil properties would be stronger.
Most of selected soil properties showed highest variation with depth under forestland and lowest...
Citation
Share