Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.165 IF 4.165
  • IF 5-year value: 4.075 IF 5-year 4.075
  • CiteScore value: 4.28 CiteScore 4.28
  • SNIP value: 1.501 SNIP 1.501
  • SJR value: 1.060 SJR 1.060
  • IPP value: 4.21 IPP 4.21
  • h5-index value: 29 h5-index 29
  • Scimago H index value: 27 Scimago H index 27
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/sed-7-3511-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/sed-7-3511-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 07 Dec 2015

Research article | 07 Dec 2015

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript for further review has not been submitted.

Soil erosion assessment and control in Northeast Wollega, Ethiopia

A. Adugna1,2, A. Abegaz1, and A. Cerdà3 A. Adugna et al.
  • 1Addis Ababa University, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
  • 2Wolaita Sodo University, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Sodo, Ethiopia
  • 3Department of Geography, Universitat de València, Blasco Ibáñez, 28, 46010, Valencia, Spain

Abstract. Soil erosion is the main driver of land degradation in Ethiopia, and in the whole region of East Africa. This study was conducted at the Northeast Wollega in West Ethiopia to estimate the soil losses by means of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). The purpose of this paper is to identify erosion spot areas and target locations for appropriate development of soil and water conservation measures. Fieldwork and household survey were conducted to identify major determinants of soil erosion control. Six principal factors were used to calculate soil loss per year, such as rainfallerosivity, soil erodiblity, slope length, slope steepness, crop management and erosion-control practices. The soil losses have shown spatio-temporal variations that range from 4.5 Mg ha-1 yr-1 in forest to 65.9 Mg ha-1 yr-1 in cropland. Results from the analysis of stepwise multiple linear regression show that sustainable soil erosion control are determined byknowledge of farmers about soil conservation, land tenure security and off-farm income at community level. Thus, policy aim at keeping land productivity will need to focus on terracing, inter-cropping and improved agro-forestry practices.

A. Adugna et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
A. Adugna et al.
A. Adugna et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,916 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
354 1,536 26 1,916 10 19
  • HTML: 354
  • PDF: 1,536
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 1,916
  • BibTeX: 10
  • EndNote: 19
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Dec 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Dec 2015)
Cited  
Saved  
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 21 Nov 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The research has been con conducted to estimate erosion risk over certain areas for land restoration. The result of the USLE showed that the annual rate of soil loss is in the range of 4.5Mgha-1y-1 in forestland and 65.9Mgha-1y-1 in cropland. The rate of soil loss in the cropland, which accounts for about 69% of the total soil loss in the study area, is very highly severe. This clearly shows that cropland should be prioritized to carry out land management practices such as minimum tillage.
The research has been con conducted to estimate erosion risk over certain areas for land...
Citation
Share