Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.165 IF 4.165
  • IF 5-year value: 4.075 IF 5-year 4.075
  • CiteScore value: 4.28 CiteScore 4.28
  • SNIP value: 1.501 SNIP 1.501
  • SJR value: 1.060 SJR 1.060
  • IPP value: 4.21 IPP 4.21
  • h5-index value: 29 h5-index 29
  • Scimago H index value: 27 Scimago H index 27
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/sed-5-737-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/sed-5-737-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 03 Jun 2013

Research article | 03 Jun 2013

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript for further review has not been submitted.

Strength constraints of shallow crustal strata from analyses of mining induced seismicity

M. Alber1, R. Fritschen2, and M. Bischoff1,* M. Alber et al.
  • 1Engineering Geology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
  • 2DMT GmbH & Co KG, Essen, Germany
  • *now at: BGR, Hannover, Germany

Abstract. Stress redistributions around large underground excavations such as coal mines may lead to failure of the surrounding rock mass. Some of these failure processes were recorded as seismic events. In this paper the different failure processes such as rock mass failure or the reactivation of faults are delineated from the seismic records. These are substantiated by rock mechanical analyses including laboratory strength tests on coal measure rocks obtained from underground drilling. Additionally, shear tests on discontinuities in coal measure rocks (slickensides in shale and rough sandstone joints) were conducted to grasp the possible variation of strength properties of faults. Numerical modeling was employed to evaluate the state of stress at the locations where seismic events did occur.

M. Alber et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
M. Alber et al.
M. Alber et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,430 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
603 768 59 1,430 21 24
  • HTML: 603
  • PDF: 768
  • XML: 59
  • Total: 1,430
  • BibTeX: 21
  • EndNote: 24
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2013)
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 20 Nov 2018
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation
Share