<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.solid-earth-discuss.net/inc/sed/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Solid Earth Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.solid-earth-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<eissn>1869-9537</eissn>
		<volume_number>4</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2012</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/sed-4-1-2012</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.solid-earth-discuss.net/4/1/2012/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.solid-earth-discuss.net/4/1/2012/sed-4-1-2012.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.solid-earth-discuss.net/4/1/2012/sed-4-1-2012.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>1</start_page>
	<end_page>31</end_page>
	<publication_date>2012-01-06</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">The lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary observed with USArray receiver functions</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>P. Kumar</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>X. Yuan</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1,3">
			<name>R. Kind</name>
			<email>kind@gfz-potsdam.de</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Mechie</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Potsdam, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">National Geophysical Research Institute NGRI (CSIR), Hyderabad, India</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Freie Universität Berlin, Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Berlin, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The dense deployment of seismic stations so far in the western half of the
United States within the USArray project provides the opportunity to study
in greater detail the structure of the lithosphere-asthenosphere system. We
use the S receiver function technique for this purpose which has higher
resolution than surface wave tomography, is sensitive to seismic
discontinuities and has no problems with multiples like P receiver
functions. Only two major discontinuities are observed in the entire area
down to about 300 km depth. These are the crust-mantle boundary (Moho) and a
negative boundary which we correlate with the lithosphere-asthenosphere
boundary (LAB) since a low velocity zone is the classical definition of the
seismic observation of the asthenosphere by Gutenberg (1926). Our S receiver
function LAB is at a depth of 70–80 km in large parts of westernmost North
America. East of the Rocky Mountains its depth is generally between 90 and
110 km. Regions with LAB depths down to about 140 km occur in a stretch from
northern Texas over the Colorado Plateau to the Columbia Basalts. These
observations agree well with tomography results in the westernmost USA and
at the east coast. However, in the central cratonic part of the USA the
tomography LAB is near 200 km depth. At this depth no discontinuity is seen
in the S receiver functions. The negative signal near 100 km depth in the
central part of the USA is interpreted by Yuan and Romanowicz (2010) or
Lekic and Romanowicz (2011) as a recently discovered mid lithospheric
discontinuity (MLD). A solution for the discrepancy between receiver
function imaging and surface wave tomography is not yet obvious and requires
more high resolution studies at other cratons before a general solution may
be found. Our results agree well with petrophysical models of increased
water content in the asthenosphere, which predict a sharp and shallow LAB
also in continents (Mierdel et al., 2007).</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Abt, D. L., Fischer, K. M., French, S. W., Ford, H. A., Yuan, H., and Romanowicz, B.: North American lithospheric discontinuity structure imaged by Ps and Sp receiver functions, J. Geophys. Res., 115, B09301, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006914doi:10.1029/2009JB006914, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Barrell, J.: The strength of the Earth&apos;s crust, J. Geol., 22, 655–683, 1914. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Currie, C. A. and Beaumont, C.: Are diamond-bearing Cretaceous kimberlites related to low-angle subduction beneath western North America? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 303, 59–70, 2011. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Dalton, C. A., Conrad, C. P., and Trehu, A. M.: What is the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary? EOS, 92, 51, 481, 2011. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Eaton, D. W., Darbyshire, F., Evans, R. L., Grütter, H., Jones, A. G., and Yuan, X.: The elusive lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath cratons, Lithos, 109, 1–22, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Fischer, K. M., Ford, H. A., Abt, D. L., and Rychert, C. A.: The Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 38, 551–575, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152438doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-040809-152438, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Ford, H. A., Fischer, K. M., Abt, D. L., Rychert, C. A., and Elkins-Tanton, L. T.: The lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary and cratonic lithospheric layering beneath Australia from Sp wave imaging, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 300, 299–310, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Geissler, W. H., Sodoudi, F., and Kind, R.: Thickness of the central and eastern European lithosphere as seen by S receiver functions, Geophys. J. Int., 181, 604–634, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04548.xdoi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04548.x, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Gutenberg, B.: Untersuchungen zur Frage, bis zu welcher Tiefe die Erde kristallin ist, Zeitschrift für Geophysik, 2, 24–29, 1926. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Jones, A. G., Plomerova, J., Korja, T., Sodoudi, F., and Spakman, W.: Europe from the bottom up: A statistical examination of the central and northern European lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary from comparing seismological and electromagnetic observations, Lithos, 120, 14–29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2010.07.013doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2010.07.013, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Karato, S.: On the origin of the asthenosphere, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., submitted, 2012. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Kästle, E. D.: Der Aufbau der Lithosphäre unter Südafrika anhand von P- und S-Receiver-Funktionen, Bachelor Thesis, Universität Potsdam, Institut für Erd- und Umweltwissenschaften, Germany, 2011. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Kind, R., Yuan, X., and Kumar, P.: Seismic receiver functions and the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, Tectonophysics, submitted, 2012. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Kumar, P. and Kawakatsu, H.: Imaging the seismic lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary of the oceanic plate, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 12, Q01006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003358doi:10.1029/2010GC003358, 2011. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Kumar, P., Yuan, X., Kind, R., and Ni, J.: Imaging the collision of the Indian and Asian Continental Lithospheres Beneath Tibet, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B06308, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JB003930doi:10.1029/2005JB003930, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Kumar, P., Kind, R., Yuan, X., and Mechie, J.: USArray receiver function images of the LAB, Seismol. Res. Lett., in print, 2012. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Lebedev, S., Boonen, J., and Trampert, J.: Seismic structure of Precambrian lithosphere: New constraints from broad-band surface-wave dispersion, Lithos, 109, 96–111, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Lekic, V. and Romanowicz, B.: Tectonic regionalization without a priori information: A cluster analysis of upper mantle tomography, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 308, 151–160, 2011. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Levander, A., Schmandt, B., Miller, M. S., Liu, K., Karlstrom, K. E., Crow, R. S., Lee, C. T. A., and Humphreys, E. D.: Continuing Colorado plateau uplift by delamination-style convective lithospheric downwelling, Nature, 472, 461–466, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10001doi:10.1038/nature10001, 2011. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Li, X., Kind, R., Yuan, X., Wölbern, I., and Hanka, W.: Rejuvenation of the lithosphere by the Hawaiian plume, Nature, 427, 6977, 827–829, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02349doi:10.1038/nature02349, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Li, X., Yuan, X., and Kind, R.: The lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary beneath the western United States, Geophys. J. Int., 170, 700–710, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03428.xdoi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03428.x, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Mierdel, K., Keppler, H., Smyth, J. R., and Langenhorst, F.: Water Solubility in Aluminous Orthopyroxene and the Origin of Earth&apos;s Asthenosphere, Science, 315, 364–368, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Miller, M. S. and Eaton, D. W.: Formation of cratonic mantle keels by arc accretion: Evidence from S receiver functions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L18305, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044366doi:10.1029/2010GL044366, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Priestley, K. and McKenzie, D.: The thermal structure of the lithosphere from shear wave velocities, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 244, 285–301, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Romanowicz, B.: The thickness of tectonic plates, Science, 324, 474–476, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1172879doi:10.1126/science.1172879, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Rychert, C. A., Rondenay, S., and Fischer, K. M.: P-to-S and S-to-P imaging of a sharp lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary beneath eastern North America, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B08314, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004619doi:10.1029/2006JB004619, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Rychert, C. A. and Shearer, P. M.: A global view of the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, Science, 324, 495–498, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1169754doi:10.1126/science.1169754, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Thybo, H.: The heterogeneous upper mantle low velocity zone, Tectonophysics, 416, 53–79, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Thybo, H. and Perchuc, E.: The seismic 8° discontinuity and partial melt in the continental mantle, Science, 275, 1626–1629, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1626doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1626, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Wegener, A.: Die Entstehung der Kontinente, Geologische Rundschau, 3, 276–292, 1912. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Yuan, X., Kind, R., Li, X., and Wang, R.: S receiver functions: Synthetics and data example, Geophys. J. Int., 175, 555–564, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Yuan, H. Y. and Romanowicz, B.: Lithospheric layering in the North American craton, Nature, 466, 1063–1068, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09332doi:10.1038/nature09332, 2010. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Zhao, W., Kumar, P., Mechie, J., Kind, R., Meissner, R., Wu, Z., Shi, D., Su, H., Xue, G., Karplus, M., and Tilmann, F.: Seismic Evidence for Tibetan Plate overriding Asian Plate, Nature Geoscience, 4, 870–873, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1309doi:10.1038/NGEO1309, 2011. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

